On Facebook for over 10 years. Now blocked and restricted on 5 Facebook accounts I have created, for 30 days on a couple and no end date on the others. Vague reasons are some violation of “community standards”. Hogwash, they don’t want us sharing truth. I’m not wasting my time with the arrogant f**kers any more. Had enough of Facebook.
Probably will be deactivating or deleting all my accounts and leaving Facebook over the next few weeks. Happy to have a small corner of mytribes for now. I’ll become more active there in time.
Click the button to go to my profile (aka “James Hawke”) on Mytribes.net…
I demand that those claiming human-induced ‘climate change’ produce real evidence based upon true science ie empirical testing by experiment of a viable hypothesis and manipulation of an identified real independent variable as a cause for the claimed observed phenomena (‘climate change’). Consequently, this evidence must NOT be based solely upon data analysis / statistical analysis / mathematical analysis, computer modelling, presumption, presupposition, opinion, correlational or observational study.
This evidence must unequivocally demonstrate via empirical testing for cause of claimed identified effect / phenomena (‘climate change’) the following: 1. that human activity alone is a direct cause of any claimed extraordinary, significant, and permanent alteration in Earth weather (‘climate change’). 2. the time scale that was sampled in the experiment (clearly identifying the effects of human activity on Earth weather over the entirety of that period). 3. what is the determined definitive normal range variation of Earth weather and for what time scale. 4. the degree (as a percentage) for which human activity has been identified independently from all other causes as contributing as a direct cause for any extraordinary variance from this normal range of world wide weather (‘climate change’). 5. how human activity alone was controlled for and manipulated in the experiment so as to identify it as an independent variable (cause), and thus distinct from all other potential causes for the claimed phenomena (‘climate change’). 6. what OTHER potential causes (for ‘climate change’) were factored and considered, measured and tested for, or may be considered as potential causes for any extraordinary variation in Earth weather (‘climate change’) over the same stated time scale. 7. the degree to which the weather of Earth may have shifted beyond the claimed normal range regardless of the presence of humans on Earth and how this was determined (a null hypothesis).
Sticking to the ground is not proof of ‘gravity’. Gravity remains an unknown thing entirely. Scientific claims of any proof or proof of “gravity waves” (see ‘LIGO’) is false and misleading.
“Black holes”, “dark matter”, and “dark energy” and other planetary, galactic, and cosmological phenomena which is attributed to “gravity” is false and misleading.
“Black holes”, “dark matter”, and “dark energy” really are only a theoretical construction – mathematically determined not empirical verified.
The idea that the earth’s mass causes the ‘gravity’ we believe we experience, and is the reason we stick to the ground is still an unproven theory – again mathematically constructed but never empirically proven.
We really do not know what or how this phenomena works – or even if it can be called a “force”. Yes, seriously.
When I (and others) proclaim “Gravity does not exist” – we are not being funny and we are not stupid or ignorant – on the contrary we are being objective critics of the false claims of science which have pervaded the public sphere.
It is obviously very important to begin a process of revealing the unfounded claims to the wider public and population.
Anyone who states otherwise or wishes to make claims that any of this is untrue, or that I (or other critics) are ignorant of the “science” or otherwise “unqualified” or “need to learn physics and/or math” etc. are being disingenuous, and you need to be wary.
Anyone with a critical enquiring, thinking mind who examines the claims of science in this field (and many others) will come to this well-founded conclusion. You do not need to “fear the math”, or be “blinded by the science”. They have baffled the public for too long and enough is enough.
Think. Investigate. Look beyond what you have assumed.
Morality is a cultural construct and invalid. Ethical living is another matter free from dogmatic doctrine and authoritarian dictate. I am no Marxist trust me. That is your bias not my label. Institutions are by nature and default centred collectives of human opinion directed at everyone else. Your concept of the poor being of low moral character is quite medieval. Humanity is evolving in its very consciousness. Care to join us?